Confounding in case control studies
نویسنده
چکیده
I read with interest the article on computerized tests to evaluate psychomotor performance in children with specific learning disabilities (SpLD) by taur and colleagues1. the study was conducted with the aim to compare the performance on a battery of six psychomotor tests of children with SpLD and those without any learning disabilities (controls) using computerized tests. the authors deserve credit for their effort. For the purpose of this study, as stated by the authors, 25 children with SpLD and 25 controls (matched for age, socio-economic status and medium of instruction) were given three training sessions over one week. After that children were asked to perform on the six computerized psychomotor tests. Results were compared between the two groups. I have a concern with the way this study was conducted and results interpreted thereof. the authors in the results stated that the children with SpLD fared significantly worse on finger tapping test, choice reaction test, digit picture substitution test and card sorting test compared to the controls. For arriving at this conclusion a baseline comparison on computer literacy of the two groups should have been assessed. This baseline comparison should have been a part of matching as difference in the use of computers or their awareness may act as a confounder in this study. A confounding variable gives rise to situations in which the effects of two processes are not separated, or the contribution of causal factors cannot be separated, or the measure of the effect of exposure or risk is distorted because of its association with other factors influencing the outcome of the study. Therefore, matching for computer knowledge at the initial stage would have prevented it or alternatively an adjustment for difference in knowledge about computers should have been conducted. This is important in view of ever increasing use of technology by children across all sections of society. Sunil Kumar Raina Department of Community Medicine Dr R.P. Govt. Medical College, Tanda 176 001 Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India [email protected]
منابع مشابه
بررسی روش سناسی مطالعه مورد- متقاطع در اپیدمیولوژی
The case-crossover design was developed in the early 1990s to study the effects of transient, short-term exposures on the risk of acute events such as myocardial infarction. To estimate relative risk, the exposure frequency during a period just before outcome onset (hazard period) is compared with exposure frequency during control time(s) in that person rather than in a control. One or more "co...
متن کاملMethodological issues of confounding in analytical epidemiologic studies
Background: Confounding can be thought of as mixing the effect of exposure on the risk of disease with a third factor which distorts the measure of association such as risk ratio or odds ratio. This bias arises because of complex functional relationship of confounder with both exposure and disease (outcome). In this article, we provided a conceptual framework review of confounding issues in epi...
متن کاملOn the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.
The use of propensity scores to adjust for measured confounding factors has become increasingly popular in cohort studies. However, their use in case-control and case-cohort studies has received little attention. The authors present some theory on the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies and present the results of simulation studies that examine whethe...
متن کاملاستفاده از Propensity Score برای همسان سازی نمونه ها در یک مطالعه مورد شاهدی
Background and Aim: Case-Control studies provide evidence in the area of health. Validity and accuracy of such studies depend to a large extent on the similarity (similar distributions) of the case and control groups according to confounding variables. Matching is a method for controlling or eliminating the effects of important confounders. Matching using propensity score has recently been intr...
متن کاملAnalysis of matched case-control studies.
There are two common misconceptions about case-control studies: that matching in itself eliminates (controls) confounding by the matching factors, and that if matching has been performed, then a “matched analysis” is required. However, matching in a case-control study does not control for confounding by the matching factors; in fact it can introduce confounding by the matching factors even when...
متن کاملBridging case-control studies and randomized trials
Randomized trials and observational studies, such as case-control studies, are often seen as opposing approaches. However, in many instances results obtained by different designs may complement each other. For instance, case-control studies on aetiology of disease may help to give the direction of future trials. In this commentary, the author discusses the purpose of randomization and observati...
متن کامل